AMA: Meta (Facebook) Product Leadership, Bhaskar Krishnan on Product Vision

Product teams and firms should think about the relatioship between the Product, features & goals, the products' & companies' roadmap and finally the company strategy & mission! All these are related and are critical to build disruptve firms at scale * Company Mission is how the world sees your company and the change it wants to bring * Company Strategy is the logical plan to bring your company’s mission into being * Product Strategy is logical plan for how the product will drive its part of the company strategy * Product Roadmap is the sequence of features that implement the Product Strategy * Product Goals are the quarterly and day-to-day outcomes of the Product Roadmap that measure progress against the Product Strategy Ravi Mehta has written a brilliant note that outlines this and how the Product-Strategh stack looks and all these steps matter as do their relationship with each other https://www.ravi-mehta.com/product-strategy-stack/

* Every product is built to solve a user/ people problem or help solve a pain-point. This should be the main focus when building a product vision and the most important questions are ‘Who is this product for’ and ‘What problem is it solving’? * These two questions should lead into ‘Why does this product solve it’ question. The third question is particularly important for category defining products. The iPhone, when launched, focused on the typical consumer who wanted a personal device to store pictures of loved ones and access the internet rather than the business user whose needs were well served by the Blackberry * There are several simple frameworks that can be used to go deeper into this and Intuit’s Design for Delight is a simple but effective framework (http://www.intuitlabs.com/design-for-delight)

* Data & Metrics are at the heart of every product, be it Consumer, Enterprise or Platform. A metrics tree or hierarchy is critical and should follow the Execute -> Features -> Roadmap -> Strategy -> Vision structure highlighted in another question * The metrics dashboard should track the metrics across these different parts of the Product Strategy Stack. Each level of metrics is relevant for a different stakeholder or leadership layer in the firm. The metrics around Company Vision & Mission matter for the Exeuctive Leadership team, the metrics around the Company & Product Strategy matter for the Senior Leaders in the firm and the metrics around Product launches, feautres & roadmaps matter for the Product teams * The metrics above would also be tracked in different cadences and frequencies. The product-related metrics would be tracked daily and others would be at weekly, monthly or quarterly frequencies

Vision statements are critical for products, product portfolios and companies. Firms with clear vision statements are able to adapt, evolve and focus on solving problems that their customers face, better than competitors and in a manner that brings forward all their strengths. Firms without clear vision statements and products without one become stale, one-hit wonders or worse, seasonal crazes like beanie babies Here are vision statements from two financial services firms 1) “aspire to be the best, execute superbly, build a great team & winning culture” 2) “serve as a trusted partner to our clients by responsibly providing financial services that enable growth & economic progress”. The first statement does a good job of conveying the firm’s values and its culture but does not offer any color on the business, the problem it is solving or the value to its customers. The second firm does a better job of touching upon the business and the type of impact it wants to create but it is still too vague to be a vision statement Here is a good vision statement - ‘Make financial progress possible for everyone’. Credit Karma does this by offering information & tools to each of its customers to understand where they are in the credit & financial products journey.

* Vision statements should be simple, describe the value and stand the test of time (atleast one or two market cycles) * Every product is built to solve a user/ people problem or help solve a pain-point. This should be the main focus when building a product vision and the most important questions are ‘Who is this product for’ and ‘What problem is it solving’? * Teams that answer the two questions above typically get their vision statement right and teams that focus on teh urgent, immediate or playing catch-up to competition (btoh real & perceived) usually do not * One of the best examples is is that of the iPhone vs Blackberry - the iPhone focused on solving real-consumer problems in accessing the internet & online content from your phone while the Blackberry foucssed on adding features for their Corporate customers * The interesting sub-plot here is that Sony Ericsson & Nokia had smartphones that were much more capable than the iPhone when it launched and Sony Ericsson was a leader world-wide. But, they almost didn't have a Vision (or didn't seem to have one) and threw away their marketshare & lead by throwing features & specs at consumers that didn't help them in any manner * This brings us to another critical point in Product Vision - Timing! Great products could be ideated years or decades before the Technology allows them to be! General Magic almost launched the first smartphone in early 90s, almost 20-years before the iPhone! Apple itself launched the first tablet in the early 90s (but killed it). This mix of market awareness, technology limitations or capablities, consumer willingness to pay, etc all matter when defining a Prodcut Vision

* Product Vision is similar to a compass for explorers! Product Vision sets the North Star for the product teams and ensures that the Product Principles, Values & Strategy aligns with the Vision on a daily basis * Its easy for Product teams to devolve into a mess of features or play catch-up to competitors, etc without a singular vision thats bigger than the team's daily activities. Sony Ericcson, Nokia & Blackberry (smartphones), Bolt (electic cars) or Yahoo (Consumer & AdTech) are examples of firms that lost sight of their vision

* For any Product, the hierarcy, in terms of immediate to long-term is Execute -> Features -> Roadmap -> Strategy -> Vision * The focus for any product team should be to execute & launch and then working on the features & building on the roadmap from a bottoms-up perspective. They should also embark on a top-down appraoch of understanding the market landscape, the user problems they can solve profitably and setting the vision. The intersection of these approaches can take anywhere from a few weeks to a few months to a few years and depends on the stage of the firm, the product, the type of company and the lifestage * For start-ups, Vision trumpes everything else and would be required before they raise capital, attract talent or are able to build. Tesla is an excellent example here. * For large firms, product in market thats generating revenue trumps everything else and they have the chance to stumble upon a good strategy or vision if they keep iterating. But, this isn't a given, most firms stumble & fall rather than pick themselves up & iterate. Chevy has the vision laid out for them by Tesla but they haven't been able to take the Bolt to where Tesla is. * For other firms, the answer lies in the middle of the specturm. PoleStar & Riviian are able to ride on Tesla's coat-tails, Toyota continue to follow their incremental approach with the Prius but it feels like an opporunity lost, BMW & Merc have launched incredible electic cars that feel like the future, etc

Product vision distills why a product does what it does and how it envisions the future. As we saw above, it's critical to spend time crafting the product vision and the strategic narrative that follows from it. Two firms that had brilliant product visions and have built world-class & global platforms changed their product visions a few years ago. The new product visions have spurred these firms to greater heights! * Facebook changed its vision statement from “Making the world more open and connected” to “Give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together”. Facebook’s original mission was one of the best during its time and helped Facebook connect the world through the FB App, Instagram & WhatsApp. It also helped in making the world more open by the products they built such as Groups, Marketplace, Newsfeed, etc. * This mission helped Facebook grow into the largest social media firm in the world and in having the most number of users. But, the world has also changed in the 10-years since Facebook wrote the original mission and the same openness they lived by led to fake news, online trolling & hatred and people feeling miserable on social media. * Facebook did a pivot to their new vision statement, where they realized that the goal is to help the users build community. The second part of the vision statement is about bringing the world closer, not further. This new statement has worked very well as the firm has refocused on users, reduced fake news and offered tools for users, small merchants, insta influencers, etc to build communities and monetise better * Likewise, Google changed its vision statement from ‘organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful’ to ‘provide access to the world’s information in one click’. * The first vision statement worked for Google when they were a search engine and the internet was accessed from desktops (& laptops) using browsers. This vision statement helped Google index the world’s information and become the default search engine for the world. Becoming the default search engine also meant offering multiple languages and expanding beyond text into images, videos, etc and they did a stellar job there also * The iPhone changed it all and over the past 10-years, people access the internet through apps, smartphone widgets and mobile web, rather than the desktop. People’s attention spans are decreasing and every firm & app is focusing on getting information within fewer clicks. The new vision statement acknowledges and has enabled Google to focus on building the best Mobile Apps across Maps, Search, Photos, etc and the best operating systems & browsers. * Both examples above highlight great companies that executed brilliantly on their original vision statements but realized that their user’s needs and the world around them was changing. They then changed their vision statements to acknowledge the changes and enable them to expand & grow with the new world. * Apple’s name change from Apple Computer to Apple Inc is another change along the same lines * Apple also changed their vision statement from ‘make a contribution to the world by making tools for the mind that advance humankind’ to ‘bringing the best user experience to its customers through its innovative hardware, software and services’

This is a question that is close to my heart and I love to see folks transition from Product Owners to Stellar PMs. Taking a step back, I truly love to see people become the best versions of themselves and it doesn't matter if they are Product Owners, Product Managers, Program Managers or any & every role they like to see themselves in! The key to excel in any of these roles is to understand that every role has a few basic requirements but once they are met, there is the opportunity to bring a lot of creativity, one's unique interests and leverage the strengths that you bring to the table. For a Product Manager, there are about four key skill or competency buckets that matter: 1) Product Strategy 2) Product Execution 3) Influencing People 4) Customer/ Market Insights The best product managers (the so-called mythical unicorns or the 1% PMs or the PM influencers) are supposedly the best at all of these competencies. The secret here is that no one needs to be best at any of these competencies all the time. Its enough to meet the basic requirements for each of these competencies and excel at those that you are good at. Then, chose the PM role that helps you excel. Lets map these competencies to broad PM types: 1) Platform PM - needs great execution, very good people skills & good insights 2) Growth PM - needs excellent market insights & very good strategy 3) UX PM - needs great insights, very good exectution & good strategy 4) New Products PM - needs great insights & startegy and good execution So, PMs need to excel at atleast one competenc and be good at one or two others. The above attributes can also be mapped to the stage of a PMs career and their seniority & ability to infleunce a firm's strategy & vision 1) Early career PMs need to focus on Exeuction. The nuts & bolts of any operation and product are important for future success. Refer to the other Qs about Steve Jobs, Tony Fadell, etc to understand the role of context in building killer products 2) Mid-career PMs need to start thinking more about customers and developing people skills. At this stage, the ability to influence people, shape decisions and understand what customers want becomes more improtant. At the same time, there are folks who join Tech firms as mid-career PMs and its critical thay they spend a lot of time on understanding the nuts & bolts of the operation. This ability to do deep will help bring their other skills to the front 3) PM Leaders need to understand the Product strategy, the market landscape, the trends and then the customer needs & problems. If they have come up the traditional PM ladder in Tech firms, they would have developed the other skills that will help them success at this level. For folks that have'nt, the inability to dive deep, be speciifc or understand the details ususally derails careers! The average tenure of external Product VPs (& above) in start-ups & other late stage firms is less than 18-months for this reason! This ended up being one of the longest answers and I feel that I am barely scratching the surface here! In addition to the above, Patience (esp with Oneself), the unwillingness to accept medoctity (which is ironically, opposite of being patient), the ability to take people along and the ability to synthesize complex problems into simple bite-size solutions is what sets stellar PMs apart! The more I spend time as a PM, the more I realise its an art but a Socratic method & scientific approach can help one get there!

* Hybrid products are exponentially harder to build than pure software products. Software can be updated via the cloud, at any time and with any frequency but hardware cannot * The form factor, the physical functionality, etc of a hybrid product need way more thought, user testing and context than the software. For instance, the physical components of the Tesla 3, the sensors, cameras, etc are paramount compared to the Maps, Apple Carplay integration or self-driving updates that can be done through the cloud * Context, background and living with the problem are the key for hybrid products. Only a Steve Jobs who has been living & breathing both Technology & Liberal Arts could have made the IMac, the iPod or the iPhone so user-friendly. But, a Steve Jobs as a visionary CEO alone isn't enough for such hybrid products. You also need a Today Fadell who has been living & breathing electonic products for 20+ years to launch the iPod and later the iPhone. * So, for people interested in hybrid products or teams builidng them, my reommendation would be to go deep and to live & breathe the problem before they are able to create a vision or build the product. And when creating the vision, over-index on the physical form & function since the first impression on users is very important and the physical form cannot be changed atleast for a year (or longer)